Press Here
SUNDAYS @ 9 AM
NBC BAY AREA

Facebook Comments Too Vanilla?

Email
|
Print

    NEWSLETTERS

    TechCrunch was one of the first publications to talk about its recent switch to Facebook Comments, saying that commenters now are decidedly gushing in a "sycophantic way." 

    Most of the reason is that having to sign in with a Facebook account establishes a real identity and hit-and-run snipes and insults are harder to do when one can't maintain anonymity. So, like TechCrunch said, its trolls have dwindled and its comments are decidedly gushing  -- but they prefer that over the sheer "anonymous" nastiness that showed up on a daily basis.

    While Steve Cheney laments the new "neutered" comments and the loss of authenticity, the ubiquitous Robert Scoble argues about the power of using one's name.

    In journalism, we know the importance of using someone's name and spend a lot of time correctly identifying that person in a story. A commenter saying something rude, crude or malicious is easy when it's done anonymously, but requiring a real name and account to comment and that element tends to disappear. Does that mean it's neutering our free speech? Not really, but it is creating more accountability in a world that judges people for what they say and who they are online.