The Palm Pre is hot. It sold out the first day it went on sale last weekend. It's given techies (and jealous Sprint users) an alternative to the Apple iPhone. Well done, Palm. I've played with the Pre myself, and am very impressed. It's a genuine hit.
But is Palm messing with success?
The Web is already heavy with rumors about Palm's next phone, called (at least for now) Eos. While not a touch-screen Pre-like phone, it is said to be the next of its kind of take advantage of Palm's new WebOS, a software platform which outperforms the iPhone in some key ways that make it friendly to social-networking addicts and heavy communicators. Perhaps more importantly, it's also said to be available on AT&T.
Did Palm not get the "Osborne" memo?
Osborne, an early computer maker, is one of the great cautionary tales in the technology industry. It's the quintessential story of a company that got ahead of itself: Osborne released its first computer in 1981 to good reviews and strong sales. Its second computer was hyped before it was ready, and sales of its first model plummeted. Osborne filed for bankruptcy in 1983.
Palm's finances were already perilous. Elevation Partners, a private equity firm backed by U2 frontman Bono and some Valley veterans, essentially bailed it out in recent years. It needs the Pre to do well. With Apple discounting its basic iPhone to $99, it's clear that the smartphone wars are to be fought on several battlefields at the same time. Which is good for us consumers. But with all the attention placed on the Pre right now, and with Sprint and Palm (finally) having a hit on its hands, couldn't Palm put a lid on the Eos for a little while longer?