| By Will Evans and Christina Jewett |
| Center for Investigative Reporting |
| Publish date: Oct. 22, 2013 |
Los Angeles County authorities have let problem drug rehabilitation providers run away with millions of dollars in public money and failed to follow through on threats to stop funding errant clinics, according to anew report
by the county auditor-controller.
County and state officials should communicate better, crack down on deadbeat clinics, set higher standards for approving new ones and conduct criminal background checks of clinic operators, the report stated.
The report, released late Friday, was commissioned by the county Board of Supervisors after The Center for Investigative Reporting and CNN revealed pervasive and unchecked fraud in the Drug Medi-Cal system, which provides addiction counseling for the poor. A state audit ordered in response to the investigation is due next year.
The county report confirmed many of the findings from the Rehab Racket investigation. It noted, for example, that L.A. County has failed to follow its own policy calling for immediate termination of clinics caught falsifying paperwork. The agency responsible for clinic oversight, L.A. County Substance Abuse Prevention and Control, told the auditor that the lapse happened with “only a small number of poorly performing contractors.”
The report also found that communication gaps between the county and state continued after the fraud was uncovered. It noted that state officials temporarily shut down 53 Los Angeles rehab centers without explaining specific reasons for the suspensions to county leaders.
California
The county Department of Public Health, which includes the substance abuse agency, already has made improvements and will use the audit “to identify additional opportunities to enhance oversight,” David Sommers, a spokesman for the county’s chief executive office, wrote in an email.
Officials must become more aggressive in collecting money that rehab centers owe the county, the report found. Rehab clinics are paid upfront for the services they claim to provide, and only afterward do state and county audits find inappropriate billings and request a refund.
County reviews questioned nearly $452,000 in clinic claims from the last fiscal year, but the audit found the substance abuse agency has collected about $48,000, or 11 percent of that money. The agency has collected 61 percent of the roughly $204,000 in refunds demanded the previous year.
The county also racks up debt after it cuts off clinics for serious violations. Terminated clinics currently owe $6.4 million, the audit says, but the substance abuse agency has referred $1.7 million of that to the county treasurer for collection.
Such collections are difficult, agency Finance Director Leo Busa told CIR in June.
“Some of it is almost impossible to recover,” he said. “They’ve gone out of business, and they scatter in the wind.”
At the state level, the Department of Health Care Services has not required criminal background checks for clinic leaders, despite a state law barring felons from running Medi-Cal clinics. The CIR and CNN investigation found felons like Alexander Ferdman, convicted of organized crime for an insurance scam, running taxpayer-funded clinics.
The auditor’s report called for state regulators to check clinic management against the U.S. Department of Justice’s criminal database and to set up a system that would alert them to new convictions. If the state doesn’t conduct background checks, the report said, then the county should.
State regulators already check clinic leaders against a list of people who are excluded from billing government health programs, but CIR and CNN found that some banned operators go undetected. Despite his longtime exclusion for student loan fraud, George Ilouno, for example, ran a Long Beach clinic for several years before he was charged with Medi-Cal fraud this year. Ilouno pleaded guilty in September and had to pay the state $90,000.
In a previous interview, John Viernes Jr., the county’s Substance Abuse Prevention and Control director, expressed concerns about weeding out rehab providers based on past crimes.
“That’s a real tough question for a substance abuse field where 70 percent of the (counselors) in the business have criminal records,” he said.
This story was edited by Amy Pyle and copy edited by Nikki Frick and Christine Lee.
The independent, nonprofit Center for Investigative Reporting is the country’s largest investigative reporting team. For more, visit www.cironline.org. The reporters can be reached at wevans@cironline.org and cjewett@cironline.org.
