Inspector General criticizes lack of public education about IRSs plans to implement little known strategy to garnish tax refunds for taxpayers who dont purchase health insurance under new Federal Affordable Care Act beginning in 2014. This story aired on April 18, 2013.
The US Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration says that the IRS needs to do more to educate American taxpayers about the implications of the new Federal Affordable Care Act that will extend health care coverage to millions of uninsured Americans beginning in 2014.
J. Russell George
says he’s concerned that the Internal Revenue Service is making plans to implement the new changes but hasn’t adequately informed the general public about what’s coming and how it could directly affect them, especially potential tax returns uninsured taxpayers might be due.
“It (the IRS) is actually making very good progress in terms of preparing its internal systems (for the new health care law),” said Mr. George in an exclusive interview with NBC Bay Area’s Investigative Unit. “I am, however, very concerned about the fact that it’s not communicating this new requirement to the American people to the extent that it needs to be.”
It is the law just about every American has heard about. But it is a law that experts say few people, outside tax lawyers and certified public accountants, know many details about.
Congress designed the law to make sure as many as 30 million workers nationwide who are currently uninsured, including 3 million in California, will be able to obtain affordable health care insurance for their families.
But many people may not know that the law comes with a catch if you choose not to buy health insurance.
“Many Americans do not realize the extent that the Internal Revenue Service will be involved in the implementation of the Affordable Care Act,” said the US Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration George.
And if you’re not insured it will impact your tax return for the tax year 2014 and beyond.
“You think about it, you think ‘OK, “health insurance” nobody’s favorite topic and “taxes” nobody’s favorite topic’ and we’re putting them together,” said Catherine Teare
with California’s HealthCare Foundation.
Teare is a Senior Program Officer of Health Reform & Public Programs Initiative at the California HealthCare Foundation which is working to support implementation of health reform and advance the effectiveness of California’s public coverage programs. As such she is intimately familiar with how the new federal health care law will be implemented in California.
“The IRS is going to play a lot of roles,” said Teare. “There are two really important ones. First of all, people under a certain income level will be able to get subsidies, help, paying their premiums if they buy their insurance through (their state) exchange (called “Covered California” in California.) And the IRS is going to be part of administering those subsidies.”
Then there is the enforcement role that the IRS will play in making sure everyone who qualifies under the new law must buy insurance or have it provided for them through their employer.
“Starting in 2014, people will be required to have health insurance coverage. There are some exceptions,” said Teare. “For people who are required, if they don’t have insurance coverage they’ll have to pay a penalty. And the IRS is going to implement those penalties.”
It is that enforcement action part of the IRS’s new mandate that could impact millions of people in coming tax years whether they know it or not.
And the Treasury Inspector General worries too many people don’t know “it” right now.
“I am concerned,” said Inspector General George.
, who helped draft parts of the tax provisions of the new law while working at the US Treasury Department said this enforcement is to make sure every American who can pays into the new health care system in order for everyone to share the burden of costs.
“Essentially the idea is if you don’t buy health insurance you’re increasing costs for the whole health care system,” said Gamage, who teaches tax law as an Assistant Professor at the University of California’s Berkeley Law School.
While on academic leave at Berkeley Law from 2010-2012, Gamage worked as Special Counsel and Senior Stanley S. Surrey Fellow at the US Department of Treasury, Office of Tax Policy in Washington, D.C. where he worked on the federal tax implementation of the US Affordable Care Act.
Gamage concedes that this provision and the penalty for not buying insurance could, indeed, sneak up on taxpayers on tax day, 2015, and surprise them if they aren’t paying close attention.
“On your tax forms you will have to certify that you have insurance that qualifies from some source,” said Gamage. “And if you don’t you will be assessed a penalty, the individual mandate penalty.”
“It (the penalty) is calculated separately from your normal tax burden,” said Gamage. “But if you don’t pay it there are a variety of enforcement techniques that the IRS can use, one of which is to subtract that from your refund you would be owed on your existing taxes.”
And that, says the man who oversees the IRS, is a problem for taxpayers expecting a full refund who could get less money than they are expecting if they can’t prove that they have health insurance.
“That tax refund will be offset meaning that they’ll get less money, if any money,” said Inspector General George.
Right now about 48 million people nationwide and 7.1 million people in California don’t have health insurance. Not all of them will be required to purchase insurance under the new law.
As for the penalty for not buying insurance; it starts out rather small at first. The penalty for an adult will only be $95 and $47.50 for each child.
But the penalties quickly rise in subsequent years and will actually add up each month that a taxpayer does not have insurance.
WEB EXTRA: Interview with J Russell George
Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration in Washington, D.C. Mr. George’s office oversees the Internal Revenue Service and conducts regular Inspector General’s reports on what the IRS does well and where it needs to improve.
WEB EXTRA: Interview with Professor David Gamage
Assistant Professor at the University of California’s Berkeley Law School where he teaches tax law. While on academic leave at Berkeley Law from 2010-2012, Gamage worked as Special Counsel and Senior Stanley S Surrey Fellow at the US Department of Treasury, Office of Tax Policy in Washington, D.C. where he worked on the federal tax implementation of the US Affordable Care Act.
WEB EXTRA: Interview with Catherine Teare
Senior Program Officer of Health Reform & Public Programs Initiative at the California HealthCare Foundation which is working to support implementation of health reform and advance the effectiveness of California’s public coverage programs.