PG&E to Charge Customers For Pipeline Upgrade

One resident said: "They blew up our town, they killed eight people, and here we are giving them cash"

View Comments (
)
|
Email
|
Print

    NEWSLETTERS

    Consumers will be forced to pay for 55 percent of the $2.2 billion project to update PG&E's natural gas pipelines. NBC Bay Area's Jean Elle reports on this controversial decision. (Published Thursday, Dec 20, 2012)

    The California Public Utilities Commission today approved a plan  that will allow PG&E to charge ratepayers for more than half of a $2.2  billion project to upgrade its natural gas pipelines.

    The approval of the plan, with a last-minute change removing a  requirement that the utility take lower profits for five years, angered  officials from San Bruno where a ruptured pipeline resulted in an explosion  that killed eight people and destroyed 38 homes in 2010.

    PG&E's project includes pressure testing 783 miles of natural gas  pipelines, replacing 186 miles of pipelines while upgrading another 199 miles  and installing 228 automatic shutoff valves.

    The plan approved by the CPUC at its meeting in San Francisco  today requires PG&E ratepayers to foot the bill for roughly 55 percent of the  projects while the utility's shareholders will fund the rest.

    An initial ruling had initially put ratepayers on the hook for  roughly 49 percent of the project and initially included a five-year term in  which PG&E's rate of profit on its improvement investments would be reduced  to 6.05 percent as part of a judge's recommendation.

    But Wednesday evening, regulators amended the plan to disallow  that recommendation and raise the rate to about 11 percent, giving what San  Bruno Mayor Jim Ruane said equated to a $130 million "Christmas present" to  PG&E.

    "It's a slap in the face," Ruane said. "They blew up our town,  they killed eight people, and here we are giving them cash."

    State Sen. Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo, said the change showed that  "PG&E owns the state of California and the PUC."

    Hill said, "It's shameful that they would allow PG&E to profit  from their behavior, their negligence, their poor maintenance."

    Thomas Long, legal director for the watchdog group The Utility  Reform Network, said many of the pipelines in the project are only being  replaced because PG&E lost the records for them.

    "They had no idea if these pipelines were operating at safe  pressures," Long said. "PG&E loses records, we should pay for it?"

    PG&E spokeswoman Brittany Chord said the utility's shareholders  have already spent $1.5 billion since 2010 on work to meet previously  existing regulations and that "this proposed plan was put forward to address  new safety expectations that were set by the CPUC."

    Chord said, "We know we made a lot of mistakes, and we know we  have a lot of work to do."

    She said PG&E had sought to have ratepayers fund a higher  percentage of the pipeline project -- which is expected to add about $2 to  the average monthly residential utility bill -- but they were rebuffed by the  CPUC.

    In announcing the commission's decision, Commissioner Mike Florio  said the project was "about moving forward and creating the safest natural  gas infrastructure in the nation."

    Florio said the ruling was a balance between the requests of PG&E  and those of San Bruno officials and survivors of the blast.

    "We have to make sure PG&E isn't rewarded for the past ... but we  can't expect PG&E in the past to meet standards that didn't exist until now,"  he said.