Santa Clara to Vote on End Around Stadium Play

Vote is all about protecting funds for the proposed stadium

View Comments (
)
|
Email
|
Print

    NEWSLETTERS

    TK
    Here's a rendering of the Santa Clara stadium.

    The Santa Clara City Council is expected to approve a plan  that would allow the city to keep its redevelopment agency alive by making an  $11.2 million payment to the state, a move that would lock in necessary funds  for the 49ers stadium project.
       
    The action comes as Santa Clara and other cities all over  California are awaiting a state Supreme Court decision on a lawsuit filed by  the League of California Cities and the California Redevelopment Association. 

    The lawsuit is challenging the state's plan to eliminate  redevelopment agencies unless cities and counties take part in an "opt-in"  program in which they would divert some funds back to the state.

    The program would allow redevelopment agencies that want to  continue operating to do so by making payments to the state totaling $1.7  billion this year and $400 million every year thereafter, said Pam Morrison,  administrative analyst to the Santa Clara city manager.

    According to the state's formula, Santa Clara's share of that  total is $11.2 million this year and $2.7 million next year, she said.

    Although the law is still on hold pending the state Supreme Court  decision, Morrison said the City Council is expected to pass the opt-in  ordinance tonight "just in case."

    If the state's plan is allowed to take effect, Santa Clara's  participation in the opt-in program would allow it to reimburse the 49ers for  a $40 million advance from the team for its stadium project, albeit at a  slower pace than it had planned to.

    "We're opting in because it would at least give us the opportunity  to make the attempt to repay the 49ers and to continue to do some affordable  housing projects," Morrison said. "It's better than not having a  redevelopment agency at all."

    The agency has committed to paying $40 million toward the $987  million stadium, but because it does not currently have those funds, the  49ers have agreed to advance the agency's portion with the understanding that  the team would be reimbursed.

    Morrison said, however, that even if the city opts in, the  redevelopment agency's ability to repay that advance is reduced because of  the amount of money that would have to go to the state.

    "It's going to be more difficult and will take us longer to pay  the advance," she said.
       
    But, she said, the opt-in program is still a better option than  the possibility of losing nearly $15 million annually in property lease  revenues if the redevelopment agency is dissolved, which Morrison said would  be "devastating" to the city.
       
    Until the court makes a ruling in the case -- which could take  until January -- redevelopment agencies are barred from disposing of any  assets or taking on new projects.

    Bay City News