UC Berkeley Campus Bans Electronic Cigarettes, Vaporizers | NBC Bay Area

UC Berkeley Campus Bans Electronic Cigarettes, Vaporizers

Popular e-cigarettes, or tobacco vaporizers, not allowed on campus.

    United States
    Great Britain


    Associated Press
    Banned at Berkeley -- and Davis, and Riverside, and wherever else there is a University of California.

    No smoking also means no vaping.

    A blanket smoking ban at University of California campuses includes "electronic cigarettes," the portable vaporizers which emit -- backers claim -- a less-unhealthy plume of vapor upon puffage, according to the Bay Area News Group.

    Growing Number of Youth Smoking Vaporizers Alarms Health Officials

    [NATL-BAY] Growing Number of Youth Smoking Vaporizers Alarms Health Officials
    It’s advertised as the best way to kick that bad habit of smoking, but critics say it may kick-start a new generation of smokers. Stephanie Chuang reports. (Published Tuesday, Oct. 1, 2013)

    Smokers of the popular devices have until Jan. 2 to vape away before the ban goes into effect.

    MORE: Growing Use of Vaporizers Alarms Health Officials

    About 10 percent of UC staffers and 8 percent of UC students smoke tobacco -- no stats are handy on how many folks around the state's campuses use the e-cigarettes. And there's also no stats available on exactly what goes into the e-cigarettes -- which is partially why it was easy for UC to ban them.

    "It's safer to ban these products as a precaution," said Josh Moskowitz, director of the School of Public Health's Center for Family and Community Health, in comments to the newspaper.

    E-cigarettes, or vaporizers, use small batteries to heat a small quantity of liquid, which contains nicotine as well as flavoring, according to the newspaper.

    Perhaps oddly, a co-founder of an electronic cigarette lobby agrees with the ban, saying that it's understandable while people "learn" about what an e-cigarette is -- and what's in them.

    For UC, it was a ban-first, learn-second decision.

    ""The onus is on the medical establishment to prove they are harmful," said Moskowitz in comments to the newspaper. "It's clearly messed up."

    More stories from NBC Bay Area: