Marijuana Not Top U.S. Cash Crop: Book

View Comments (
)
|
Email
|
Print

    NEWSLETTERS

    Getty Images
    Jars full of medical marijuana a Los Angeles dispensary. A recent book has called into question the cash value of marijuana in the United States.

    For years, legalization advocates have argued that marijuana is America’s leading cash crop, outranking corn, wheat, soy and a host of other heartland staples produced on an industrial scale.

    Bringing pot production above ground, the argument goes, could produce a $30 billion tax bonanza for cash-strapped governments and a huge savings for law enforcement and prisons.

    But new research dumps cold water on many of these claims, concluding that far from being America’s biggest cash crop, marijuana probably isn’t even in the top five. Rather, marijuana might make the top 15, “ranking somewhere between almonds and hay and perhaps closest to potatoes and grapes,” the researchers say.

    These findings are part of a new book, "Marijuana Legalization: What Everyone Needs to Know," by a team of researchers and public policy experts from Carnegie Mellon University, Pepperdine University, UCLA and the RAND Corp. 

    The authors, Jonathan Caulkins, Angela Hawken, Mark Kleiman and Beau Kilmer, analyze the costs and benefits of legalizing marijuana, challenging many commonly held assumptions on both sides of the issue. 

    In particular, the authors take aim at a widely cited 2006 report by Jon Gettman, a former director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, that valued America’s annual marijuana production at a whopping $35.8 billion.

    According to Gettman’s estimates, America’s domestic marijuana crop consists of 56.4 million marijuana plants cultivated outdoors worth $31.7 billion and 11.7 million plants cultivated indoors worth $4.1 billion. 

    “The domestic marijuana crop is larger than Cotton in Alabama, larger than Grapes, Vegetables and Hay combined in California, larger than Peanuts in Georgia, and larger than Tobacco in both South Carolina and North Carolina,” Gettman wrote.

    His report ranked California as the nation’s top producer, responsible for more than one-third of the marijuana harvest, with an estimated output of $13.8 billion.

    But these statistics are wrong, according to the new book.

    The authors write: “Analyses purporting to support the claim (that marijuana is the nation’s leading cash crop) must contort the numbers, citing the retail price of marijuana but the farm-gate price of other products, or pretending that all marijuana consumed in the United States in sinsemilla, or ignoring the fact that most marijuana used in the United States is imported, or simply starting with implausible estimates of U.S. production.”

    Gettman’s figure of $35.8 billion is particularly specious, the authors contend, because it comes from multiplying a weighted average price of $1,606 per pound by an inflated annual production figure of 22.3 million pounds. The resulting number “is larger than the best estimates of the retail sales value of all marijuana consumed in the United States – including the marijuana that is imported,” according to the book.

    Gettman, a columnist at High Times magazine, said he stands by his research, noting "differences of opinion" with the authors on many key variables, from the size of a joint (he says that on average, it's about 1 gram when you account for waste) to the percentage of marijuana consumed in the United States that is domestically produced (he says the figure is climbing because more people prefer home-grown, boutique weed).

    "Non-using analysts are woefully ignorant about marijuana consumption amounts or practices," Gettman wrote in an email.

    According to Gettman, his 2006 estimates were based on production figures that were published in various government reports and that originated with the Drug Availability Steering Committee, an interagency group that operates under the Office of National Drug Control Policy.

    However, the book authors argue that the government figures cited by Gettman were merely "hypothetical values meant only to illustrate how the arithmetic would be done if certain unknown parameters were to become known at some point in the future."

    No one can know the actual value of the domestic marijuana crop with any certainty, as most cultivation is hidden in the shadows, all the more since federal prosecutors began cracking down in states that have legalized medical marijuana. The authors' best guess is that it’s worth about $2.1 billion to $4.3 billion.

    How legalization would affect the value of domestic pot production and potential tax revenue is another complex question the authors attempt to untangle.

    While legalizing marijuana could double or triple consumption, the authors point out that it also would dramatically lower the cost of production, with growers adopting highly mechanized, large-scale techniques used by big agricultural companies.

    Under this scenario, marijuana could become the cheapest legal intoxicant, far cheaper than alcohol.  The authors suggest a legal market dominated by high-potency marijuana would produce annual tax revenues of a few billion dollars nationwide.

    By comparison, alcohol and tobacco each bring in $10 billion or more per year, according to the book.

    So what about California, where the pot industry is a fixture in some counties and growers boast of producing the most potent and most valuable strains in the country? 

    The authors don’t speculate. However, 2010 figures from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the most recent available, rank grapes at the top in California, worth $3.2 billion annually, followed by almonds ($2.8 billion), strawberries ($1.8 billion) and lettuce ($1.6 billion).

    That means that if one values the nation’s marijuana crop at the high end of the authors’ estimate, about $4 billion, California would need to account for more than 75 percent of domestic production in order for pot to rank as the state’s top cash crop.

    Inflated valuations are not the sole domain of marijuana advocates. The authors suggest that there are incentives for law enforcement officials to pump up the potential value of marijuana to present their seizures in the most favorable light.

    One recent example not covered in the book concerns marijuana eradication statistics produced by California's Bureau of Narcotics Enforcement. In 2010, the bureau reported that drug agents destroyed about 4.3 million marijuana plants in 108 days during California's annual Campaign Against Marijuana Planting.

    By pricing each plant at $3,981, the agency determined the marijuana seized that year was worth $17.2 billion, a figure that eclipses Gettman's estimate for the total value of California's annual pot production.

    "When you get an answer that doesn't pass the giggle test," the authors wrote, "you know that (at least) one of your assumptions was seriously wrong."

    View this story on California Watch

    This story was produced by California Watch, a part of the nonprofit Center for Investigative Reporting. Learn more at www.californiawatch.org.