California Bans Distributing "Deepfake" Videos Before Elections - NBC Bay Area

California Bans Distributing "Deepfake" Videos Before Elections

“Democracy rests on citizens being informed, and that isn’t free speech. It’s fake speech," said Communications Professor Dr. Matt Cabot

    processing...

    NEWSLETTERS

    California Passes Ban on "Deepfakes" Before an Election

    California has passed a ban to fight "deepfakes" -- videos and audio altered to make someone (in many cases politicians) falsely appear to say or do something that they did not. The ban only applies to the 60 days before an election. Ian Cull reports. (Published Saturday, Oct. 5, 2019)

    The rush is on to fight so-called “deepfakes”—videos and audio altered to make a person falsely appear to say something that they did not. California has passed a ban that makes it illegal to share such videos within two months before an election.

    Analysts have said that deepfakes will be used as political weapons ahead of next year’s elections.

    “It’s hard enough to be informed, to make wise decisions about candidates and political issues,” said social media expert and San Jose State Communications Professor Dr. Matt Cabot. “But with deepfake technology it makes it vastly more complicated.”

    The new law targets people distributing altered video and audio to injure the candidate’s reputation or sway voters.

    Which Airlines and Airports Are Delayed the Most?

    [NATL] Which Airlines and Airports Are Delayed the Most?

    Data from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics reveal which airlines and airports have had the most delays from January to August, 2019. They also show which carriers and airports have done a great job getting you to your destination on time.

    (Published Tuesday, Nov. 12, 2019)

    The candidate can seek damages if they can prove it was shared with malice up to 60 days before an election.

    “I think consumers need to be more careful about what they post or retweet,” Cabot said. “Be slow to believe. Is it plausible? Did it come from a trusted news source? Did it come from two trusted news sources?”

    “In the face of total inaction at the federal level, California must step up to protect our more than 20 million voters,” said State Assemblyman Marc Berman, the bill’s sponsor. “AB 730 will help deter nefarious deepfakes by holding accountable the bad actors who intentionally attempt to injure a candidate’s reputation or deceive voters into believing a candidate said or did something they never said or did.”

    There are critics of the ban. The ACLU wrote a letter to Gov. Newsom urging him to veto the bill this week.

    “Despite the author’s good intentions, this bill will not solve the problem of deceptive political videos,” it stated. “It will only result in voter confusion, malicious litigation and repression of free speech.”

    With presidential primaries just months away, Cabot disagrees.

    AP Probe: Aging US Dams Pose Risk to Thousands

    [NATL] AP Probe: Aging US Dams Pose Risk to Thousands

    An Associated Press investigation has found that thousands of people in the U.S. may be at risk from aging dams that are in poor condition. The two-year investigation identified 1,688 'high hazard' dams in 44 states and Puerto Rico.

    (Published Monday, Nov. 11, 2019)

    “The stakes are too high,” he said. “Democracy rests on citizens being informed, and that isn’t free speech. It’s fake speech.”

    Get the latest from NBC Bay Area anywhere, anytime
    • Download the App

      Available for IOS and Android