Judges: PG&E Improperly Declared 2 Natural-Gas Pipelines Safe - NBC Bay Area

Judges: PG&E Improperly Declared 2 Natural-Gas Pipelines Safe



    Not Getting Enough Sleep? What’s Your Excuse?
    NBC Bay Areas
    File image of 2010 pipeline explosion in San Bruno.

    Pacific Gas and Electric Co. could be fined for improperly declaring two natural-gas pipelines safe and using misleading filings to minimize the problem, state utilities regulators said.

    Two California Public Utilities Commission administrative law judges said that PG&E characterized substantial record keeping errors regarding two San Francisco Bay area pipelines as a routine problem, the San Francisco Chronicle reported.

    The pipelines in question are in the same regional system as the one that exploded a 2010, a blast that killed eight people and destroyed 38 homes in San Bruno.

    Poor record keeping was cited as a major factor in that incident, and the company currently faces up to $2 billion in fines for the San Bruno explosion.

    Karen Clopton and Maribeth Bushey, the commission judges, said PG&E workers last fall found that a pipeline in San Carlos was of lesser quality than company records had indicated.

    The company also discovered that it had been running a different pipeline in Millbrae at too high a pressure because of reliance on improper past testing.

    The judges said PG&E minimized these serious lapses as data "errata'' in a filing made on the day before the Fourth of July holiday, in a manner that "could be seen as an attempt to mislead the commission and the public on the significance of this new information.''

    PG&E denied that it misled regulators, and said the pipelines at issue are safe.

    Also, PG&E first approached utilities commission staffers about the record-keeping problems in February, Greg Snapper, a company spokesman, told the newspaper.

    The judges are considering hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines for the errors.