Judge Weighs in on AC Transit Labor Trouble

Pasengers stuck in middle of AC Transit labor beef

10142008 AC Transit Bus

A judge today reaffirmed his order that AC Transit must engage in binding arbitration for a new labor agreement for its 1,750 employees, including 1,200 bus drivers.

Lawyers for AC Transit, which serves parts of Alameda and Contra Costa counties, asked Alameda County Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch to reconsider his July 16 order that the bus agency use a third party to help reach a new agreement on a contract between the agency and the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 192.

Bus agency attorney Raymond Lynch said Roesch's order hinged on the union's promise that it would not engage in any strike activity, and that the union violated that promise by encouraging a sickout.

Bus drivers began calling in sick at more than twice the normal rate after management imposed a new contract on July 18. The sickout had a ripple effect, delaying commutes for as many as 200,000 passengers.

But Rosech denied AC Transit's motion today, ruling that there's no evidence that the high rate of absenteeism was anything more than a  coincidence because there is nothing to prove that union leaders directed bus drivers to call in sick.

"The motion has to be denied because AC Transit didn't demonstrate  anything to persuade me that the union was behind whatever events occurred," Roesch said.

ATU lead negotiator Claudia Hudson has repeatedly denied that  there has been a sickout.

AC Transit and the union have agreed on an arbitrator, but talks aren't scheduled to begin until Aug. 20. Roesch said he thinks talks should begin before then, saying  "there's just no reason to put it off."

He said that if he were the arbitrator, he would order the two  sides to engage in marathon talks, including over weekends, so that a new agreement could be reached quickly.The delay in starting arbitration "is just irresponsible," Roesch said.

AC Transit board members voted June 30 to impose a new contract  effective July 18 after three months of negotiations failed to result in an  agreement.

But Alameda County Superior Court Judge Judith Ford ruled on Aug. 2 that the district must honor the old contract during the arbitration  process.

Contact Us