I'm going to miss "surviving the ground." I'm going to miss "completing the process," too. But I won't miss the way the NFL rules committee likes to use words to refine officials' training. That, fortunately, will never end.
After all, I believe the NFL has been marching boldly toward creating a sport that the people who are paid to play it and pay to watch it do not understand, and that's a level of chaos I can enjoy because if we know anything at all about the NFL, it is that it has three levels of problem-solving.
#1 -- Denying that a problem exists, and calling people who say it does know-nothings, morons and potentially liable in a lawsuit.
#2 -- Admitting a problem exists only after years of careful study in which it starts with the desired result and then tailors any fact-finding to reach that result.
#3 -- Implementing a solution that solves nothing, and in doing so either makes the original problem worse or replaces it with a more vexing problem.
In fact, vice president of football operations Troy Vincent said that very thing in explaining the plan to the Washington Post's Mark Maske. "We worked backward," he said. "We looked at plays and said: Do you want that to be a catch? And then we applied that to the rule. Slight movement of the ball, it looks like we'll reverse that. Going to the ground, it looks like that's going to be eliminated. And we'll go back to the old replay standard of reverse the call on the field only when it's indisputable."
Of course, Vincent was also required to explain why "surviving the ground" and "completing the process" made sense when those were introduced, so let's move past all that to the real issue here.
Football is essentially ungovernable, and becoming more so with each additional year. Part of it is the dichotomy between making a violent game less violent without making it sufficiently less violent. Part of it is large, fast people being asked to play at full speed to strike smaller targets. Part of it is taking simple common sense as a judgment tool away from officials because at its heart, the decision-makers hate its officials and give them increasingly absurd things to adjudicate on the fly and then punish them when it can't be done.
And part of it is old football coaches being asked to tailor their sport to meet the entertainment demands of a younger demographic that isn't sitting still for a convoluted game that lasts three hours. This is another way of saying that football is slowly but surely being viewed by the younger generation as "your dad's game," and are going to basketball or e-sports or even no sports at all for their fun.
In other words, the league is trying to change a rule to address a rule that was introduced to change a rule to take judgment from people who are supposed to apply structure to a game that already had plenty of it.
So the catch rule will be changed yet again, and in two years the complaints about that rule will overwhelm the league again. We will go from "surviving the ground" to "mastering the air space" or someone equally nonsensical verbiage, and the idea of simplifying a rule book that is beating the game it explains across our skulls is simply beyond these guys.