The Baseball Hall of Fame, A Division Of Tedious Bitching Just To Hear Ourselves Bitch LLC, will announce its new class of inductees Wednesday, and we already know one thing.
People will be unhappy and make damned sure you know about it.
This is the new nature of all halls of fame -- the winners are a two-day story, but the losers go on forever, and so does the voters-are-morons sidebar. Frankly, I wonder why they don't put a plaque up in Cooperstown for that -- you know, just to give the tourists something to hate in what was originally designed to be a joyful place.
We live in a whiny society, where anyone with a different opinion than your own cannot merely be debated with or ignored, but must be savagely mocked as either learning impaired, willfully stupid or aggressively evil. Thus, the new era of "Death To Whoever Doesn't Agree With Me" is probably unavoidable.
But that's why the myth that the Hall of Fame should be a temple of honor rather than a museum of the full history of the game should have died long ago. Everyone's version of what should be honored is different, and the standard reaction to other people's dissent from that opinion has gone from "I disagree" to "How about I burn your house down?"
People being unhappy that their favorite guy didn't get the requisite 75 percent of the votes from an amorphous group of strangers who do not act in concert -- that part I get. It's not up to me to decipher why one's personal obsessions lean toward getting someone a plaque, and if we cannot invest time and energy in our pet causes, what are we as a species?
Don't answer that.
But ever since the Giants put on a full court media press for most of 1998 to get Orlando Cepeda into the Hall through its veterans committee, the idea of campaigns for any particular idol which were once considered offensive and counterproductive became a requirement, and then a marketing tool. In the Internet age, that role has been usurped by people making single-minded and mostly well-intentioned cases for their own favorites, out of simple honest devotion. Nothing wrong with that.
If it stopped there, this would be an advancement in the process. But because nothing is as sure in the Internet age as the unintended consequence of anonymous invective, I have made it my work as a Hall of Fame voter to ignore any and all such lobbying and lobbyists. No matter how well-intentioned and polite their reasoned discourse may be, it becomes someone else's demand for obedience and hive-mind orthodoxy --– and in the alternative, voter shaming and expulsion.
Moreover, the era of both benign candidate advocacy and anonymous invective serve as more reminders that the Hall of Fame and its mechanisms are political, just as Joe Morgan's letter urging that players suspected of steroid use never be allowed induction is a political act, and the changes in voting eligibility reducing the voting pool are a political act. Expanding the voting franchise is always more sensible than restricting it, but shrinking it is a statement that fewer people know about baseball than think they do, which is a weird way of saying "Fewer people are entitled to care about this thing we care so much about."
This is a longwinded way of saying I turned in my vote more than a month ago. It's the best I can do based on the hours of research I've done, and that will have to be good enough. If I wanted your opinion on it, I'd have called you by now to obtain it, so just assume that I don't. The ballot will be released when the other BBWAA votes are released, and if you need to know ahead of time who I voted for, you have a sick obsession, plus you can probably figure out the bulk of it by going to Ryan Thibodaux's Twitter site (@NotMrTibbs) and look at my prior ballots.
But if it helps, I'll tell you this much. I think Arnold Rothstein should be in the Hall of Fame, and until that injustice is righted, I will feel as though the Hall is incomplete and flawed, and I'm damned unhappy about it.
See? I got in the spirit of the thing.