'Medicare for All's' Rich Benefits 'Leapfrog' Other Nations - NBC Bay Area
Decision 2020

Decision 2020

The latest news on the race for president in 2020

'Medicare for All's' Rich Benefits 'Leapfrog' Other Nations

Shifting the sprawling U.S. health care system to a government-run "single-payer" plan is one of the top issues in the 2020 Democratic presidential primary

    processing...

    NEWSLETTERS

    Not Getting Enough Sleep? What’s Your Excuse?
    Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP, File
    Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., right, joined by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Sen . Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y. speaks during a gathering introducing the Medicare for All Act of 2019, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, April 10, 2019.

    Generous benefits. No copays. No need for private policies. The "Medicare for All" plan advocated by leading 2020 Democrats appears more lavish than what's offered in other advanced countries, compounding the cost but also potentially broadening its popular appeal.

    While other countries do provide coverage for all, benefits vary.

    But the Medicare for All plan from Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders would charge no copays or deductibles for medical care, allowing only limited cost-sharing for certain prescription drugs. Sanders would cover long-term care home and community-based services. Dental, vision and hearing coverage would be included. The House version of the legislation is along similar lines.

    "Medicare for All proposals would leapfrog other countries in terms of essentially eliminating private insurance and out-of-pocket costs, and providing very expansive benefits," said Larry Levitt, a health policy expert with the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation. "It raises questions about how realistic the proposals are."

    Sanders on the Stump Promoting His Medicare for All Plan

    [NATL] Sanders on the Stump Promoting His Medicare for All Plan

    Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont took to the podium Wednesday to talk about his Medicare for All plan. Sanders is running for the Democratic nomination for president ahead of the 2020 election.

     

    (Published Wednesday, April 10, 2019)

    Shifting the sprawling U.S. health care system to a government-run "single-payer" plan is one of the top issues in the 2020 Democratic presidential primary, but the candidates are divided. Some have endorsed Sanders' call, while others want to expand coverage within the current mix of private and government insurance. Independent studies estimate Medicare for All would dramatically increase government spending, from $25 trillion to $35 trillion or more over 10 years. It stands no chance with Republicans controlling the White House and the Senate, but it is getting hearings in the Democratic-led House.

    Economist Sherry Glied, dean of New York University's Wagner school of public policy, says the offer of generous benefits may be needed to persuade Americans satisfied with employer coverage that they would be better off in a new government plan.

    "You are going to have to be very generous if you want this to be politically appealing to lots of people," said Glied, who was a senior health care adviser in the Obama administration.

    Glied says components like benefits, copayments and deductibles would all be negotiable.

    "People put out talking points and then they see what Congress is willing to swallow," said Glied. "Who knows where it would come out in the end."

    A second congressional hearing on Medicare for All is scheduled Wednesday before the House Budget Committee. Votes this year appear unlikely. The plan is a punching bag for Republicans trying to tag Democrats as "socialists."

    6 Top Quotes From the Fourth Democratic Presidential Debate

    [NATL] 6 Top Quotes From the Fourth Democratic Presidential Debate

    Take a look at six of the most memorable lines from the fourth Democratic presidential debate held Tuesday night in Ohio.

    (Published Tuesday, Oct. 15, 2019)

    In a statement, Sanders' office said it's fair for the senator to compare Medicare for All to what other countries have because "all those other countries guarantee health care as a right," as his plan would.

    "Sen. Sanders believes providing comprehensive coverage through the government to all residents is the best way to do it," said the statement.

    If the legislation were to advance to votes, "we will hear out concerns from our colleagues and work with them to get this bill passed," the statement continued. "But we are very clear about what we want and what this country needs. Insurance company CEOs are going to pay well before the American people are."

    Two recent reports have called attention to differences among countries that cover everyone and are often held up as models for Medicare for All.

    A report from the Congressional Budget Office will be the focus of Wednesday's House hearing. Another report, for the nonpartisan Commonwealth Fund, was written by Glied. Among its findings: Other countries don't necessarily take the same approach as Medicare for All, using a range of strategies to cover all their residents.

    "Currently, single-payer bills in the U.S. tend to share the same key goals: centralizing...the system, expanding the public benefits package and eliminating private health insurance entirely," the Commonwealth report said. "However, these three features are not the norm across countries that have achieved universal coverage for health care."

    Trump Announces Turkey Sanctions After Syrian Invasion

    [NATL] Trump Announces Turkey Sanctions After Syrian Invasion

    President Donald Trump is putting new sanctions on Turkey for invading Syria amid blowback from Congress over his sudden decision to pull troops from the area. 

    (Published Tuesday, Oct. 15, 2019)

    The report found that one group of countries — including Denmark, Britain and Germany — provide comprehensive benefits. That includes, for example, mental health. They charge low copays. Those countries are the closest to Medicare for All.

    A larger group — including Australia, France, Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland and Taiwan — offer broad benefits but there may be gaps, and cost sharing is higher. Australia charges $60 for specialist visits. The Netherlands has a $465 deductible. Dental coverage may be limited.

    Finally, Canada has a narrow national benefits package. It doesn't cover outpatient prescriptions, long-term care, mental health, vision and dental. But there's no cost sharing for hospital and doctors' services. Canadians rely on private insurance and provincial governments to fill the gaps.