Wikipedia Cleared of Defamation

Lawyer for parent foundation worried about impact of recently dismissed lawsuit

By JACKSON WEST

Updated 2:30 PM PST, Fri, Aug 7, 2009

Print Email Share TWITTER FACEBOOK

Wikimedia Foundation attorney Mike Godwin shouldn't have had anything to fear from a laughable defamation lawsuit based on a Wikipedia entry.

Dave Winer

Literary agent Barbara Bauer wasn't happy about being called the "dumbest" of agents on a list title "20 Worst Literary Agents" posted to Wikipedia.

So Bauer sued the San Francisco-based Wikimedia Foundation, which oversees the website, for defamation -- even though an unaffiliated user of the online encylopedia was ultimately reponsible for creating and posting the item.

The case was dismissed by Judge James Perri of New Jersey's Superior Court based on the US Communications Decency Act's immunity from liability afforded to operators of online services.

And as a University of Santa Clara law professor pointed out, Bauer may have simply proven the poster's point in filing the suit.

However, a lawyer for the Wikimedia Foundation, Mike Godwin, took the lawsuit seriously, and mandated that the article, since deleted and replaced by a shorter version, not reappear.

Godwin should know better -- after all, he was the sage who noted that "As [an online] discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1."

In other words, according to Godwin's Law, defamation is practically built into the system -- hence the liability exemption.

Photo by Dave Winer.

Jackson West hopes former literary agent John Hodgman catches wind of this case, as it would make a good Daily Show segment.

Copyright NBC Local Media

First Published: Aug 7, 2009 1:33 PM PST

Print Email Share TWITTER FACEBOOK

0 Comments

{"totSize":2,"payload_type":"json","status":"1","results":[{"anonName":null,"pathToMedia":"391809_52684862","adminTags":null,"views":867,"createdBy":9830468,"createdByPathToPhoto":"116995/icons/defaultMember_116995_portrait.jpg","assocMediaId":null,"mediaName":"Wikipedia Cleared of Defamation","parentThreadId":null,"mediaId":1032435,"tags":null,"anonSiteUrl":null,"assocMediaType":null,"createdAt":"8 Aug 2009 01:45:40 GMT","anonEmail":null,"isVisible":true,"approved":true,"numComments":2,"reviewed":true,"createdByUsername":"thekohser","pathToPreview":"","mediaType":"EXTERNALMEDIA","commentId":"561271","subject":"","averageRating":0,"body":"This article was stinky. Owen, you need to brief the staff on how to write a properly scathing article, if it has anything to do with Wikipedia."},{"anonName":null,"pathToMedia":"391809_52684862","adminTags":null,"views":867,"createdBy":9832755,"createdByPathToPhoto":"116995/icons/defaultMember_116995_portrait.jpg","assocMediaId":null,"mediaName":"Wikipedia Cleared of Defamation","parentThreadId":null,"mediaId":1032435,"tags":null,"anonSiteUrl":null,"assocMediaType":null,"createdAt":"8 Aug 2009 03:10:37 GMT","anonEmail":null,"isVisible":true,"approved":true,"numComments":2,"reviewed":true,"createdByUsername":"ThomOleaf01","pathToPreview":"","mediaType":"EXTERNALMEDIA","commentId":"561576","subject":"","averageRating":0,"body":"This was a really poor article. How does Godwin's user-net law about conversations inevitably resulting in chat about nazis relate to the Barbara Bauer case? Defamation is practically built into the system at Wikipedia, but that has nothing to do with Godwin and everything to do with the haphazard management orchestrated by Jimmy Wales since the site's beginnings. \n\nGodwin is a damage limitation figure. And he's right to take the Bauer case seriously. Because one day someone is going to slap a huge lawsuit on Godwin's desk and no amount of spin by Godwin is going to allow the Wikimedia Foundation to wriggle out of it. \n\n\n\n\n"}],"error":"","totPages":1}